If feature definitions are turned off in a file, it doesn't show up when reference and it's not possible to even view without going back into the file. It would be helpful to have the option to turn on feature defintions the same way levels can be...
Ability to have multiple superstructure types in one bridge definition. For example, steel main spans with concrete approach spans is currently defined as 3 bridges
Many bridges have approach spans that are smaller in length to the main spans. For example, a bridge that crosses over a railroad ROW may have prestressed concrete in the approach spans and a continuous steel bridge over the railroad, then the end...
You can name an element if drawn 1 at a time with tangents and arcs. But if you use Complex by PI you can't go back and name your elements to make it easier to report on your geometry.
There needs to be a better way to understand the relationships between elements and reference files that are created by snap rules and constraints.
This improvement would use graphic symbols (construction elements) to represent constraint relationships in plan view. For horizontal elements that are snapped, there are the snap glyphs that show that there is a relationship, but there is not a w...
ONE DIALOG BOX TO MAKE SETUP. SO YOU CAN SET ANNOTION GROUP, FEATURE SYMOLOGIES, FEATURE DEFINITIONS, ELEMENT TEMPLATE AND SET LEVEL OF TEXT FOR AUTOMATIC ANNOTATIONS. REALLY CUMBERSOME TO HAVE TO GO TO SO MANY OTHER PLACES TO SETUP FOR ONE CODE
DU conduits external wall controled by Feature Symbology
We have the option to define a template to pipes external walls, but only through the feature definition. For all other elements of the pipe, OR allows for feature symbology. From my experience, symbologys work better and are more constant.
We have the ability to create multiple profiles from multiple surfaces at the same time, but there are occasions where I only need to define a single profile line based on multiple surfaces. It would be handy if there was an option to create a pro...