Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 1603

Update to Manual for Bridge Evaluation 3 rd edition

The current version of LBC we're using references the Manual for Bridge Evaluation, 2nd Edition as the basis for bridge rating. I'm wondering if there are plans to update this to reference the 3rd Edition instead. If such an update is planned, cou...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Designer 0 Needs review

Interoperability of concrete diaphragm from OBM to LBC for open/close box beam types

There’s a need for improved interoperability between OBM and LBC when working with concrete diaphragms in open or closed box beam configurations. Specifically, the transfer of diaphragm data—such as start, end, and interior diaphragms—for box gird...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Designer 0 Needs review

Allow automatic POI definition from bearing to bearing (for camber and deflections)

For final bridge plans involving a steel bridge, we need to report dead load deflections at either the 10th or 20th points along the span—from bearing to bearing. While the program does calculate these points, it currently measures them from the e...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Designer 0 Needs review

RMBridge--Seismic Eigen Analysis with CQC Method for Repeated Sub-Systems

In eigenvalue analysis of repetitive structures—where identical sub-systems exist independently within a single model—the same frequencies and eigenmodes are often assigned repeatedly to each sub-system. This leads to an issue with the CQC (Comple...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Designer 0 Needs review

Camber on the beam, Beam need to be curved and follow the underside of the deck without gaps- Australia specific

The current beam hog modeling behavior is not as expected. While deck thickening can be applied, the supporting beams remain straight and do not conform to the underside profile of the deck. In reality, the beams should follow the curved shape of ...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0 Needs review

The fatigue stress range calculation doesn’t follow as per AASHTO Table 6.6.1.2.3-1, Section 7.2

LBS V22.00.02.19CS0035224 Service Case 1233802: [CS0035224] The fatigue stress range calculation doesn’t follow as per AASHTO Table 6.6.1.2.3-1, Section 7.2 Product Backlog Item 1233801: (VM):LBS:V22:The fatigue stress range calculation doesn’t fo...
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0

( OBM > Deck > Thickness variation) Deck variations remain normal to alignment.

I am attempting to model a 3 span concrete slab bridge with thickened haunches over the supports. I am using a typical deck template. My thickness variations are shown in the first attachment. The Bridge has a 10 degree skew angle at the supports....
about 1 month ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0 Planned

Ruled Copy Enhancement to Complex By Element Tool

There is currently not a way to create a ruled copy of an element when using the Complex By Element tool. Being able to create a ruled copy of a range of segments and curves into a complex element with a different feature definition would be a hel...
about 2 years ago in Geometry / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 0 Future consideration

Standard Report Formatting

We use reports generated in the Civil Reports Browser to export reports that go to contractors in the field. We often run into issues with the formatting of the report not being set correctly. This problem is compounded by the fact that formatting...
almost 2 years ago in OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer / Reports 0 Future consideration

Want a warning when detach a reference file used by civil labeler with element association

When a corridor is based on an alignment from a reference file we get a warning when we try to detach the alignment reference file to minimize the chance of breaking the connection between the corridor and it's source alignment. Can we similarly g...
over 2 years ago in Drawing Production / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / User Interface 0 Future consideration