I created the Civil Label for the 100’ elevation along a geometric element, but I want to be able to pick where the labeling starts and not at the start of the geometric element. I want to establish a target to start the 1st label at a prompted cl...

Currently when developing a object that is at a skew, whether it be a road, bridge, culvert, or other detail modeling. If the start/end of the object is at a skew compared to the alignment that it is attached to, it is difficult to model. The user...

Currently if you place a superelevation lane on a tangent alignment, no points will show up in the superelevation editor. I would like that automatically even in tangent sections, the start and end points are placed in the superelevation editor so...

A terrain model was created with one graphical filter. Currently, there is a option to update the terrain model from graphical filter, but this only uses the graphical filter that was used to make the terrain model originally. It would be great if...

It is cumbersome to delete Civil Labels and place new ones when a simple change is required. Similar to how Geopak Plan View Labeler worked, it would be ideal if you could edit a previously placed Civil Label. Also being able to match a Civil Labe...

The way it is now, It's just too complex to create and custum the seeds for each client. Too many files, too many things to control and in too many folders/.cgf. You have to create many seeds with different specifics for each sheet size/scale/plan...

We need the ability to annotate component quantities on cross sections like you can the cut/fill volumes. Information could be pulled from the Quantities Report by Named Boundary.

The biggest drawback to creating multiple points in ORD vs one single dual coded point in InRoads survey is overlapping text in annotation/labeling.

Create a tool to export the DU project so it can be imported in another OpenRoads/OpenSite/OpenFlows dgn file. This would make possible to easily share projects or merge smaler ones in a compiled file for a macro analisys. Or, like in many cases, ...

This is a request to enhance the annotation groups. Can there be a toggle in the annotation group to have the ability to group the different annotation definitions together. For example, we have lots of annotation groups that have multiple text fa...