Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

Applications

Showing 1263

Request for Capability to Display/Not Display Specific Components of the Roadway Model in ConceptStation

In ConceptStation, the entire roadway model is in the same display category (Road) such that it is not currently possible to turn on/off specific components of the model – for example, cut/fill sideslopes. This product idea is requesting for diffe...
4 months ago in OpenRoads ConceptStation 0 Future consideration

Request to Modify Superelevation Rate for Roadways in ConceptStation

In ConceptStation, superelevation rates are automatically applied based on design speed of the roadway. However, this product idea is requesting an enhancement capability to apply a desired superelevation rate to the roadway independent of the rat...
4 months ago in OpenRoads ConceptStation 0 Future consideration

Selection Set Enhancement on Report Survey Elements Tool

In the Report Survey Elements tool, there is currently not a way to run this tool on a selection set of survey points from a field book. When a selection set of points is selected before launching the Report Survey Elements tool, the report only g...
over 1 year ago in OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer / Survey 0 Future consideration

Drawing Model Optional

Creation of the drawing Model is Optional in sheet production in MicroStation. I believe this should be true for civil Plan as well. We should be able to create a drawing seed that does not have the option ON for creating drawing. Most of the Plan...

Allow for Densify Horizontal Value and the Densify Vertical Value fields unlocked in order to give more user control to corridor stroking

We need improved stroking control for corridors. Currently stroking for corridors is defined by configuration variables i.e. CIVIL_DEFAULT_CURVE_STROKING and CIVIL_DEFAULT_PROFILE_STROKING, for horizontal and vertical curves respectively, which ta...
almost 2 years ago in Modeling / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer 6 Future consideration

Wingwall to follow horizontal alignment (curved)

It would be very usefull to have the ability to place wingwalls with option to follow horizontal alignment including curved alignment. Currently we only have the option to follow the vertical profile.
21 days ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0 Future consideration

Abutment back batter negative

It would be very useful to have the possibility to create a negative back batter (narrow bottom) for an abutment, since currently the back batter can only be positive (wider bottom).
21 days ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0 Future consideration

Option to turn off the cut backwall with wingwall

The automated ''Cut Backwall with Wingwall'' of OBM 2023 release is very practical but it would be usefull to have the option to turn it off in some particular situation. e.g. When we want the Wingwall to go all through the front of the StemWall o...
21 days ago in OpenBridge Modeler 0 Future consideration

Export Field Book data with Observations AND Attributes

I process survey data for the Maine Department of Transportation. We have been transitioning from InRoads to OpenRoads for about a year now and are currently testing OpenRoads Designer 2023. We really need a way to export edited Field Book data wi...
8 months ago in OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer / Survey 0 Future consideration

Rapid Station-to-Station Advancement in Dynamic Cross Sections - ORD

InRoads SS2 roadway designer provided the function to click and hold the "next station" button to rapidly pan and fast forward through the corridor. OpenRoads Dynamic Cross Sections requires you to click and advance one station at a time which is ...
over 1 year ago in Modeling / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 1 Future consideration