I would like the ability to place a civil cell along a survey feature that is referenced. We use a simple civil cell and cross sections to help compute existing pavement cross slopes.
This would give us the ability to make our models more complete within OBM rather than having to either model using MicroStation tools or another software (ProStructures).
Bridge engineering would greatly benefit from having rebar cages that are parametric in nature so we do not need to start over on rebar when a design change occurs.
When creating drawing files using the One sheet per dgn method the current workflow produces files with only a drawing model and sheet model. With this type of file the user loses the ability to track using civil analysis, updating standards per d...
When opening a dynamic cross section on an alignment, the user is asked to enter a starting station and interval. I would assume that if I entered an even station and even interval, say 10+00 and 100 ft, that the dynamic cross section would skip f...
Option to define only a single beam in the Beam Layout
Currently OBM requires atleast two beams in the beam layout. Users working on bridge expansion projects, or with rail bridges have requested allowing bridges with a single beam.
ORD needs a pay item tool to manage all pay items and quantities for a project. This would help with keeping up with pay items that do not have elements in a file, especially in regard to digital delivery. PowerGeopak had a quantity manager that c...
Ability to differentiate between the different types of Rail Crossover
The crossover function has been retired between schema 9 and 10 in favor of turnout "connections". So it is no longer possible to identify a single crossover with a unique asset IDs. A crossover object should be added that consist of the sub eleme...
0
Future consideration